The UK government has announced its support for the long-debated Lower Thames Crossing, a major infrastructure project that would create a new road link between Essex and Kent.
The proposed tunnel, set to run beneath the Thames from Tilbury to Gravesend, aims to alleviate congestion on the overburdened Dartford Crossing.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed today that the government is exploring private financing options for the project, describing it as part of the “infrastructure that the country desperately needs.”
If approved, the £8.3 billion tunnel would become the UK’s largest road tunnel and one of the most expensive transport projects in British history.
A final decision on whether to grant a ‘Development Consent Order’ approval is expected by May 23. However, while the government pushes the project forward, public opinion remains mixed.
For some residents in Essex, frustration is mounting over the time taken to make a decision. Cals Back voiced his frustration: “They’ve been talking about building this for about five years, let alone started building it. By the time it’s built, we’ll need three more.”
Others believe that while the crossing could be useful, it should focus on more than just road traffic. Lee Boatwright argued that alternative transport links should be included in the plans: “I’d like to see it made, provided it doesn’t just accommodate cars. If it provides further transport links, like via train or bicycle, that would be helpful and facilitate greater employment and economic opportunities on both sides of the tunnel. But all having additional roads will accomplish is just the movement of congestion. Time and time again, we’re shown that what we build—or choose not to build—affects how people travel.”
Meanwhile, others are skeptical about the potential costs to drivers. John Hearnden welcomed the project but warned of inevitable toll charges: “It’s about time. But make no mistake—this will not be a free crossing. Along with Dartford, Blackwall, and soon-to-be Silvertown Tunnel, they will all carry a charge.”
As the deadline for approval approaches, the debate continues over whether the Lower Thames Crossing will truly ease congestion or simply shift the problem elsewhere—at a cost to motorists.